[c-nsp] ASR1004 vs 7606(RSP720-CXL)
Mark Tinka
mtinka at globaltransit.net
Fri Nov 27 05:01:04 EST 2009
On Thursday 26 November 2009 07:32:37 am David Hughes wrote:
> From a customer perspective who uses 6500s for L2/L3
> aggregation in the DC and MPLS/IP core functionality, I
> can see them losing their shine. They are a solid
> platform and I do like them a lot but working with the
> caveats can be a pain. N7K is starting to look like a
> winning platform :
Same here - we love the 6500 to bits. It's simply solid
provided you know which buttons NOT to push (easy in our
case, they only do pure Layer 2 Ethernet forwarding).
However, for any new purchases, we're now looking at the
Nexus 7000's and Juniper's EX8200's because they make more
sense for 10Gbps Layer 2 aggregation, and will scale to
40Gbps and 100Gbps.
Even with the SUP2T looming in the horizon, we'd be insane
thinking we can grow with the 6500 in the future beyond
10Gbps.
Cheers,
Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20091127/4ac9bde5/attachment-0001.bin>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list