[c-nsp] Anomaly Detection Module/Anomaly Guard Module
Jared Mauch
jared at puck.nether.net
Thu Oct 8 16:59:25 EDT 2009
On Oct 8, 2009, at 4:50 PM, Justin Shore wrote:
> Drew Weaver wrote:
>> I was wondering if anyone has any experience working with the Cisco
>> ADM AGM modules for the 6500s and how they compare with external
>> appliance based solutions for DDoS mitigation.
>> Anyone have any opinions on these?
>> It seems like it would be nice to just drop these into a few
>> systems but I'm just trying to avoid caveats that mitigate (pun
>> intended) the usefulness of these products.
>
> If you try to buy the LCs your account team should try to convince
> you to go with the appliances instead. My account team told me that
> they LCs are being terminated at some point in the future and
> replaced with the appliances so if you buy the LCs today you will
> most likely run into software limitations down the road as
> appliances get all the good stuff and the LCs get bug fixes only (at
> some point in their life at least). I'd go with the appliances.
There have been a number of different rumors floating around related
to this that I've heard. I certainly would avoid investing in
something that does not have a clear roadmap. If they can't present
you roadmap slides, panic?
Either way, there are other solutions in this space as well.
- Jared
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list