[c-nsp] IOS question for c12406

[Leif Sawyer]

 I understand this.

My point is that Feature Navigator is not a worthwhile tool for investigating
the differences between the trains,  which is why I'm asking for feedback.

Real. World. Feedback.  As in people who have tested already.

Does this make sense yet?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eninja [mailto:eninja at gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 4:22 PM
> To: Leif Sawyer
> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net; e ninja
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IOS question for c12406
>
> GSR 12Ks only run DCEF. So any software suitable for this
> platform will support DCEF.
>
> Feature navigator is imperfect - like a lot of 'tools' on CCO.
>
> Eninja
>
>
>
> On Oct 16, 2009, at 2:09 AM, Leif Sawyer <lsawyer at gci.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm stating a that Feature Set Navigator is unstable for
> purposes of
> > my research (based on the (d)CEF issue, and lack of updates)  and
> > asking for feedback about which train (SY or S)  to use on
> my 12406,
> > given the listed linecards.
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Eninja [mailto:eninja at gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 4:07 PM
> >> To: Leif Sawyer
> >> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net; e ninja
> >> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IOS question for c12406
> >>
> >> Leif,
> >>
> >> Not sure what you're asking but GSR 12K is a distributed platform
> >> where each LC switches packets independently of the RP....and
> >> whatever IOS is running on the box.
> >>
> >> Eninja
> >>
> >>
> >> On Oct 15, 2009, at 10:37 PM, Leif Sawyer <lsawyer at gci.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> In the process of upgrading from a  c12008  to a c12406, with the
> >>> following
> >>> linecards:
> >>>
> >>> SIP-601 + SPA-10X1GE-V2
> >>> 2 x PRP-2
> >>> LC-4OC3/POS-SM
> >>> 4GE-SFP-LC
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Looks like I've got a choice between these two:
> >>>       c12kprp-k4p-mz.120-32.SY10.bin
> >>>       c12kprp-k4p-mz.120-33.S5.bin
> >>>
> >>> feature-set comparison doesn't list these, but based on the most
> >>> recent version in it, the only difference that I would be
> concerned
> >>> with is
> >>>       CEF/dCEF - Cisco Express Forwarding
> >>>
> >>> however, in botting the SY train, it appears that dCEF truly is
> >>> enabled.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Anybody have any experience with these, recommendations,
> >> comments or
> >>> caveats?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Leif
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> >>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >>
>