[c-nsp] IOS question for c12406

Eninja eninja at gmail.com
Thu Oct 15 20:33:43 EDT 2009


Any worthwhile "real world" feedback would involve folks understanding  
what protocols and technologies you intend to deploy rather than just  
a list of LCs.

Eninja



On Oct 16, 2009, at 2:25 AM, Leif Sawyer <lsawyer at gci.com> wrote:

> I understand this.
>
> My point is that Feature Navigator is not a worthwhile tool for  
> investigating
> the differences between the trains,  which is why I'm asking for  
> feedback.
>
> Real. World. Feedback.  As in people who have tested already.
>
> Does this make sense yet?
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Eninja [mailto:eninja at gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 4:22 PM
>> To: Leif Sawyer
>> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net; e ninja
>> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IOS question for c12406
>>
>> GSR 12Ks only run DCEF. So any software suitable for this
>> platform will support DCEF.
>>
>> Feature navigator is imperfect - like a lot of 'tools' on CCO.
>>
>> Eninja
>>
>>
>>
>> On Oct 16, 2009, at 2:09 AM, Leif Sawyer <lsawyer at gci.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm stating a that Feature Set Navigator is unstable for
>> purposes of
>>> my research (based on the (d)CEF issue, and lack of updates)  and
>>> asking for feedback about which train (SY or S)  to use on
>> my 12406,
>>> given the listed linecards.
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Eninja [mailto:eninja at gmail.com]
>>>> Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 4:07 PM
>>>> To: Leif Sawyer
>>>> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net; e ninja
>>>> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IOS question for c12406
>>>>
>>>> Leif,
>>>>
>>>> Not sure what you're asking but GSR 12K is a distributed platform
>>>> where each LC switches packets independently of the RP....and
>>>> whatever IOS is running on the box.
>>>>
>>>> Eninja
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 15, 2009, at 10:37 PM, Leif Sawyer <lsawyer at gci.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In the process of upgrading from a  c12008  to a c12406, with the
>>>>> following
>>>>> linecards:
>>>>>
>>>>> SIP-601 + SPA-10X1GE-V2
>>>>> 2 x PRP-2
>>>>> LC-4OC3/POS-SM
>>>>> 4GE-SFP-LC
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Looks like I've got a choice between these two:
>>>>>      c12kprp-k4p-mz.120-32.SY10.bin
>>>>>      c12kprp-k4p-mz.120-33.S5.bin
>>>>>
>>>>> feature-set comparison doesn't list these, but based on the most
>>>>> recent version in it, the only difference that I would be
>> concerned
>>>>> with is
>>>>>      CEF/dCEF - Cisco Express Forwarding
>>>>>
>>>>> however, in botting the SY train, it appears that dCEF truly is
>>>>> enabled.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Anybody have any experience with these, recommendations,
>>>> comments or
>>>>> caveats?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Leif
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>>>
>>


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list