[c-nsp] RES: IOS question for c12406

[Leonardo Gama Souza]

Hi,

Both are similar in performance and suitable for you hardware, but watch
out for some bugs that were not fixed in 33S5 yet.
CSCsz12423, CSCsx94290 and CSCsz19255.

I'd go with SY.

You can check additional information at:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_0s/release/ntes/120SNEWF.html
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_0/12_0sy/release/notes/120SYrn.ht
ml

Unfortunately they are not updated as well...


-----Mensagem original-----
De: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] Em nome de Leif Sawyer
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 15 de outubro de 2009 21:10
Para: Eninja
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Assunto: Re: [c-nsp] IOS question for c12406

I'm stating a that Feature Set Navigator is unstable for purposes
of my research (based on the (d)CEF issue, and lack of updates)  and
asking for feedback about which train (SY or S)  to use on my 12406,
given the listed linecards.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eninja [mailto:eninja at gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 4:07 PM
> To: Leif Sawyer
> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net; e ninja
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IOS question for c12406
>
> Leif,
>
> Not sure what you're asking but GSR 12K is a distributed
> platform where each LC switches packets independently of the
> RP....and whatever IOS is running on the box.
>
> Eninja
>
>
> On Oct 15, 2009, at 10:37 PM, Leif Sawyer <lsawyer at gci.com> wrote:
>
> > In the process of upgrading from a  c12008  to a c12406, with the
> > following
> > linecards:
> >
> > SIP-601 + SPA-10X1GE-V2
> > 2 x PRP-2
> > LC-4OC3/POS-SM
> > 4GE-SFP-LC
> >
> >
> > Looks like I've got a choice between these two:
> >        c12kprp-k4p-mz.120-32.SY10.bin
> >        c12kprp-k4p-mz.120-33.S5.bin
> >
> > feature-set comparison doesn't list these, but based on the most
> > recent version in it, the only difference that I would be concerned
> > with is
> >        CEF/dCEF - Cisco Express Forwarding
> >
> > however, in botting the SY train, it appears that dCEF truly is
> > enabled.
> >
> >
> > Anybody have any experience with these, recommendations,
> comments or
> > caveats?
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Leif
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/