[c-nsp] 6500 - stateful failover, reason?

Bill Blackford BBlackford at nwresd.k12.or.us
Tue Sep 22 16:07:47 EDT 2009


<snip>
This is normal -- the new processor has to rebuild all routing protocols when it comes online from RPR or RPR+ mode.  Even with SSO mode, if NSF is not configured with all peers on all protocols, the sessions are broken down and rebuilt.
</snip>

I recently had event very much like this. In my case, even SSO/NSF dropped some adjacencies during this switchover.

-b


-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Brandon Ewing
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 12:07 PM
To: Drew Weaver
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 6500 - stateful failover, reason?

On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 02:37:41PM -0400, Drew Weaver wrote:
> Is there any way to get more information about what caused a fail-over between two supervisors in a 6500?
> 
> All I can appear to get is "Active crashed." from show redundancy switchover and my syslog doesn't have any information either.

If it actually crashed, you may want to investigate whether a crashinfo file was left behind.

> 
> Also, is it normal that during switchover you will lose protocols (OSPF) and that you will see messages like these in the log?
> 

This is normal -- the new processor has to rebuild all routing protocols when it comes online from RPR or RPR+ mode.  Even with SSO mode, if NSF is not configured with all peers on all protocols, the sessions are broken down and rebuilt.

> Sep 22 08:41:17.651 EDT: %C6KPWR-SP-4-PSOK: power supply 1 turned on.
> Sep 22 08:41:17.699 EDT: %C6KPWR-SP-4-PSOK: power supply 2 turned on.
> 

This is normal, as part of the standby supervisor finishing initialization

> The log messages sort of confuse me because show version indicates:
> 
> uptime is 10 weeks, 4 days, 1 hour, 35 minutes
> 
> So it's been up 10 weeks but the power supplies were just turned on < 12 hours ago? I assume that is just random log-spew from the hot-supervisor taking over, though?

For more information about uptime for given processors, try show redundancy -- it should give total chassis uptime, last switchover time, number of switchovers, and time on active processor.

> 
> -Drew
> 

-- 
Brandon Ewing                                        (nicotine at warningg.com)


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list