[c-nsp] modular code for the 6500

[Dale W. Carder]

My theory has been that we'll run modular only when we will
have to, i.e. when monolithic is no longer a reasonable
option.

I figure that day will be when once of two forces collide:
a) the last important big customer holding out finally gives
modular their blessing and no longer demands monolithic builds.
b) new hardware with only modular code.  probably will require
step 'a' above.

Having gotten to play with the modularity features on a demo
CRS-1 in 2005, "modular IOS" is, well, <yawn>.

Dale

On Sep 24, 2009, at 10:05 PM, Tony Varriale wrote:

> I've attempted it with a couple of customers and it always ended up  
> being a train wreck.
>
> I'm not even recommending it until it gets much further along and  
> gets some serious field experience.
>
> tv
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "harbor235" <harbor235 at gmail.com>
> To: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 11:15 AM
> Subject: [c-nsp] modular code for the 6500
>
>
>> Is anyone out there using 6500 modular code? Is it stable? I have a  
>> 6509
>> with 720-3B, I would like
>> to use the modualr code but also do not want instability, any
>> thoughts/experiences would be appreciated.
>>
>> mike
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/