[c-nsp] Experience on MPLS-TP (MPLS Transport profile)

Farhan Jaffer bandhani at gmail.com
Sun Apr 25 07:32:48 EDT 2010


Yes, few features taken out to simplify things, like PHP, etc, but it will
work with IP/MPLS backbone.

I am not sure how (and why) telco's ready to accept this new technology
sooner or later.

-FJ


On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Mark Tinka <mtinka at globaltransit.net>wrote:

> On Sunday 25 April 2010 07:04:45 pm Farhan Jaffer wrote:
>
> > Thanks Mark for the update.
> >
> > Let's see how next generation of Transport Networks look
> >  like!
>
> It's very different from regular MPLS, with a number of
> features taken out to simplify things the way (I think)
> telco's would prefer them.
>
> Personally, I wouldn't run it, as it's probably easier to
> add OAM capabilities into existing MPLS (but that's likely
> because I'm already happy with IP/MPLS). However, it would
> very appealing to telco's who are hesitant to run packetized
> networks with the exception of Ethernet.
>
> Nonetheless, yes, I'd like to see what it looks like in the
> end (MPLS-TP).
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mark.
>


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list