[c-nsp] full duplex mismatch speed - dynamips
Gert Doering
gert at greenie.muc.de
Fri Aug 20 05:12:27 EDT 2010
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:03:12AM +0100, Heath Jones wrote:
> You response appreciated. One fatal assumption though is me only forcing one
> end of the link - where did that come from? Read back over my post, keeping
> in mind that I force both ends to 100/full.
If you can ensure(!) that both ends are always force-config'ed, then
there is nothing wrong with forcing 100/full (except for those devices
where that doesn't really work, unfortunately, there's a number of them).
The problem is that networks change. A server/router breaks down, gets
exchanged in the middle of the night. Configuration can not be copy-paste'd
(because it's different hardware), so "duplex full" gets lost.
These things happen, and in my experience, if a network runs for 5 years,
you have lots and lots of duplex mismatches creep into your network in
various places - we took over a larger hosting business some years ago,
and they had been religiously nailing "manual forced full-duplex!!"
everywhere. I found at least 10 customer connections that had
developed duplex mismatches over time...
[..]
> Do you have a view on what causes an end (or both ends) of a link to all of
> a sudden change state and think the other end is not capable of 100/full?
> That is what I am trying to understand. I am also referring to a link that
> is not erroring like mad and the occurrences might be as low as once per
> week.
Never seen that. But that could be cabling that "just barely so" works,
and if something changes (humidity, ...) tolerance is exceeded...
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list