[c-nsp] Cat6500 modular IOS - direction?

[Benjamin Lovell]

Absolutely correct. We are by no means "backing away from", "sunsetting", "scaling back development" or anything else to that effect, the 6500 platform. 

-Ben

On Aug 27, 2010, at 2:26 PM, Łukasz Bromirski wrote:

> On 2010-08-27 20:20, Tim Durack wrote:
> 
>> Despite claims to the opposite, I don't think Cisco are committing
>> much engineering resources to the C6K at this point in its life.
> 
> On the contrary. You'll see a lot of new things soon and the 6500
> stays a flagship for Enterprise deployments and services for the DC.
> 
> Competitors are just trying to make you belive *their* worst nightmare
> is going away.
> 
> -- 
> "Everything will be okay in the end.  |                 Łukasz Bromirski
> If it's not okay, it's not the end." |      http://lukasz.bromirski.net
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/