[c-nsp] Is the 6704 really as terrible as everyone says?
cisco-nsp
cisco-nsp at slepicka.net
Thu Dec 2 11:23:53 EST 2010
I've experienced output queue drops on interfaces that have high-bandwidth/bursty traffic patterns (e.g., multicast traffic being replicated to multiple VLANs on a trunk). For other scenarios, where 1Gb won't do the job, but I don't need anywhere near 10Gb, they work fine. If I could do it all over again, I'd just get the 6708s, but it sounds like the 6704s would work fine in your scenario.
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Drew Weaver
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 9:41 AM
To: cisco-nsp
Subject: [c-nsp] Is the 6704 really as terrible as everyone says?
I've read several posts on here that lead me to believe that the WS-6704-10G is essentially the worst linecard ever produced.
The problem is, I only need 2 ports of 10G and just to replace 2x1Gbps uplinks that almost never get anywhere near their line rate capacity.
If they are really, really, awful. I will probably just end up getting a 6708 for this particular switch, but I would rather not considering the huge price difference.
Currently I am using the 1G ports off of the Sup720 as the uplink, and I hear those have awful buffers as well.
So when upgrading from the ports on the Sup720 to a 6704, is that still a bad move?
thanks,
-Drew
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list