[c-nsp] which one is ugly

[Ziv Leyes]

I think also "ip classless" together with "ip subnet-zero" will do the trick


-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Peter Rathlev
Sent: Saturday, December 11, 2010 7:46 PM
To: Good One
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] which one is ugly

On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 19:55 +0500, Good One wrote:
> Thanks Gert. It seems you could not use 192.168.0.0/32 as loopback or
> 192.168.0.0/31 on a point to point interface. So all of Cisco's IOSs 
> are treating class C ending with .0 as a whole /24 network instead of 
> single IP route?

You might need "ip subnet-zero" in you config. It's default on more recent IOS versions. What combination of hardware/software are you trying this on?

--
Peter


_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

 
 
************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses.
************************************************************************************




The information contained in this e-mail message and its attachments is confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender, and then delete the message from your computer.  Thank you!

******** This mail was sent via Mail-SeCure System.********



 
 
************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses.
************************************************************************************