[c-nsp] which one is ugly

Peter Rathlev peter at rathlev.dk
Sat Dec 11 12:45:53 EST 2010


On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 19:55 +0500, Good One wrote:
> Thanks Gert. It seems you could not use 192.168.0.0/32 as loopback or
> 192.168.0.0/31 on a point to point interface. So all of Cisco's IOSs
> are treating class C ending with .0 as a whole /24 network instead of
> single IP route?

You might need "ip subnet-zero" in you config. It's default on more
recent IOS versions. What combination of hardware/software are you
trying this on?

-- 
Peter




More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list