[c-nsp] which one is ugly

[Lee]

On 12/11/10, Good One <good1 at live.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Gert. It seems you could not use 192.168.0.0/32 as loopback or
> 192.168.0.0/31 on a point to point interface.

It works on a nexus 7000:
interface Ethernet1/1
  vrf member vpc
  ip address 192.168.0.0/31
  no shutdown

> So all of Cisco's IOSs are
> treating class C ending with .0 as a whole /24 network instead of single IP
> route?

For the purposes of 'sh ip route' maybe..  Routing happens correctly
for 192.168.0.0/31; it's just that the output of 'sh ip route' could
be improved.

Lee