[c-nsp] v6 NAT-PT Support

[Aftab Siddiqui]

Yes Jens, you are right, its more like a dead thing but NAT64 is not
supported on all cisco platforms so to start with the old equipments its
necessary to use the dead RFC. Please suggest if there is any alternative to
what I've been trying to achieve.

Regards,

Aftab A. Siddiqui


On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Jens Link <lists at quux.de> wrote:

> Mack McBride <mack.mcbride at viawest.com> writes:
>
> > You need DNS64 as well as NAT64.
> > NAT-PT is just NAT64 without additional support for FTP and SIP and such.
>
> I always thought NAT-PT is dead for quite some time now.
>
> RFC4966 - Reasons to Move the Network Address Translator - Protocol
>          Translator (NAT-PT) to Historic Status
>
> Jens
> --
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> | Foelderichstr. 40   | 13595 Berlin, Germany    | +49-151-18721264     |
> | http://blog.quux.de | jabber: jenslink at guug.de | -------------------  |
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>