[c-nsp] Odd IPv6 Issue

[Pete Lumbis]

[adding the list]


So none of the routes are being installed on RouterA from the BGP
table into the RIB? all the routes are marked as RIB failure in the
BGP table of RouterA?

I remember there being a debug that will show you why a route isn't
installed into the routing table from BGP, but I can't remember what
it is and I don't have access to a box at the moment to look it up,
but I think it's "debug ip bgp update" or "debug ip bgp event" but I
could be totally wrong.

The other things I would think of are the common IPv4 issues, which
are sync enabled, next hop (which we covered) and OSPF RID != BGP RID.

Have you tried it without route reflectors in the mix? Do you see the
same problem?

-Pete

On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Jimmy Changa
<jimmy.changa007 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, pingable also ;)
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Dec 21, 2010, at 2:25 PM, Pete Lumbis <alumbis at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Random guess, but are the BGP next hops reachable by the RR?
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Jimmy Changa
>> <jimmy.changa007 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I have a router (routerA) that is a route-reflector client to two upstream
>>> routers (routerb and routerc). The 3 routers have full IPv6 BGP tables,
>>> however if I look at routerA's routing table, there are not BGP routes in
>>> it. While I can see the route for say, ipv6.google.com, the router says it
>>> has not route to the site.
>>>
>>> Any thoughts on what might be the issue?
>>>
>>> Jimmy
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>>
>