[c-nsp] Best practice - Core vs Access Router

Manu Chao linux.yahoo at gmail.com
Tue Feb 9 09:47:44 EST 2010


 J MX and T work very very well you are right

On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Saku Ytti <saku at ytti.fi> wrote:

> On (2010-02-09 14:47 +0100), Manu Chao wrote:
>
> > Too much BGP and traffic for your (old) 6509 router (even if with 3BXL).
> >
> > If you have the budget, i would push for Cisco ASR or Juniper M Core
>
> There is nothing in the data that supports your remark, the routers peak
> pps rate is below CFC system performance and there is plenty of TCAM space
> free.
> Also I welcome you to look into JNPR MX, instead of M.
>
> --
>  ++ytti
>  _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list