[c-nsp] Best practice - Core vs Access Router

Church, Charles Charles.Church at harris.com
Tue Feb 9 12:39:33 EST 2010

I was going by the 'show proc cpu hist' he gave for both the SP and RP.
Both looked pretty bad across the board.


-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Phil Mayers
Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 10:56 AM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Best practice - Core vs Access Router

On 09/02/10 15:03, Church, Charles wrote:
> The weird part is the NDE process is still using CPU.  Which netflow
> are you using for 'mls flow ip xxx'?  Since both the RP and SP CPU are

What evidence do we have for the RP and SP both being hit?

> getting crushed at times, seems like more than just a punted packet issue,
> since that would be primarily RP, wouldn't it?

Not if it were a loop
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 6595 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20100209/ad89e44d/attachment.bin>

More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list