[c-nsp] Best practice - Core vs Access Router

[Tony Varriale]

show ip traffic?  Anything incrementing in there by a significant amount? 
How fast do your drops/flushes increment?

I assume these are 6704s without DFCs?  If not, what are those ports?

tv
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Andy B." <globichen at gmail.com>
To: "David Freedman" <david.freedman at uk.clara.net>
Cc: "nsp-cisco" <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 1:00 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Best practice - Core vs Access Router


> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 7:48 PM, David Freedman
> <david.freedman at uk.clara.net> wrote:
>> So, are you checking your interfaces for incrementing drop/error 
>> counters?
>>
>> Are you seeing any of this when there is the problem occuring?
>> (clear counters , sh int summ etc..)
>>
>
> I am having input drops all the time, no matter how high or low I set
> the incoming hold-queue.
>
> The OSPF and IBGP interfaces approx. 30 minutes after I cleared the 
> counters:
>
> TenGigabitEthernet8/1 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
>  Input queue: 0/2000/622/622 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 
> 0
>
> TenGigabitEthernet9/1 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
>  Input queue: 0/4096/1664/1664 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output 
> drops: 0
>
> TenGigabitEthernet9/2 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
>  Input queue: 0/4096/1916/1916 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output 
> drops: 0
>
>
> These links are not congested! Te9/1 is the busiest with maybe 6.5 out
> of 10 Gig. The other two are below 5 Gig.
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/