[c-nsp] what is it with 3550s?

[Mark Tinka]

On Tuesday 23 February 2010 04:07:17 am Jon Lewis wrote:

> And that's the issue.  Normally, progress means newer
>  gear supports the features of older gear plus new
>  features.  In this case, egress policing took a large
>  step backwards.

As did SVI support for BFD on the 6500 on later code, but 
let me not wake Gert and others :-).

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20100223/637865bf/attachment.bin>