[c-nsp] what is it with 3550s?

Gert Doering gert at greenie.muc.de
Tue Feb 23 16:41:18 EST 2010


Hi,

On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 06:23:26PM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote:
> As did SVI support for BFD on the 6500 on later code, but 
> let me not wake Gert and others :-).

Ho humm, I was visiting Cisco Munich today, but I didn't even get to *that*
point.  When I started ranting to the AM present about the 20 different 
operating systems on Cisco devices today, and the 6500/7600 BU mess, he 
was already entering brainwash mode ("you have to understand how a big 
company works!  there are good reasons to this!  this is the best path
for Cisco and our customers!").

I have no idea how to get that point (BFD is good! make it happen! on SVI!)
across to the relevant people... *sigh*

gert

-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20100223/d566dc39/attachment.bin>


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list