[c-nsp] what is it with 3550s?
Gert Doering
gert at greenie.muc.de
Tue Feb 23 16:41:18 EST 2010
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 06:23:26PM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote:
> As did SVI support for BFD on the 6500 on later code, but
> let me not wake Gert and others :-).
Ho humm, I was visiting Cisco Munich today, but I didn't even get to *that*
point. When I started ranting to the AM present about the 20 different
operating systems on Cisco devices today, and the 6500/7600 BU mess, he
was already entering brainwash mode ("you have to understand how a big
company works! there are good reasons to this! this is the best path
for Cisco and our customers!").
I have no idea how to get that point (BFD is good! make it happen! on SVI!)
across to the relevant people... *sigh*
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20100223/d566dc39/attachment.bin>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list