[c-nsp] ES20 throughput in the weeds?
Jason Lixfeld
jason at lixfeld.ca
Tue Feb 23 18:32:13 EST 2010
We've got an 7600-ES20-GE3CXL HW 1.2 FW 12.2(33r)SRB SW 12.2(33)SRC4 in a 7609/Sup720 3BXL chassis. We ran some performance tests for a customer, and we were quite appalled by the results. We're using Exfo test sets to run RFC2544 patterns between two ports.
We're using 7 frame sizes; 64, 128, 256, 512, 1024, 1280, 1518.
When we look at the throughput results, we see this:
Frame Size TX-to-RX - Layer 1-2-3 (Mbps)
64 449.197861
128 538.181818
256 560.97561
512 974.358974
1024 956.043956
1280 1000
1518 994.825356
Now if we do that same test on another card, say a WS-X6724-SFP, we get very different results:
Frame Size TX-to-RX - Layer 1-2-3 (Mbps)
64 1000
128 1000
256 1000
512 1000
1024 1000
1280 1000
1518 1000
I've tried the same test on a Juniper EX4200, and an ME3400E-12CS and all the results are identical to the WS-X6724-SFP. The ES20 seems to be the anomaly here.
I know that processing smaller packets is generally much more taxing than processing large packets, so I didn't really expect to see line rate on any of the tests that were run, but considering the 6724 reported what seem to be line rate results vs. the ES20, I can't help but to wonder whether I've got a bad card or something.
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list