[c-nsp] Purposed of uRPF's "allow-default" Option?

[Antonio Querubin]

On Fri, 29 Jan 2010, Devon True wrote:

> So it is for the situation where you do not have a full table (so strict
> and/or loose mode would not work), but you want uRPF on the edge to be
> able to drop packets whose network is routed to null on your FIB?

To be able to accept and forward (not drop) packets from networks that are 
reached by your default route.  Hence the term ALLOW-default.

Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282 x3003
e-mail/xmpp:  tony at lava.net