[c-nsp] 6500 xconnect port-channel?

[David Hughes]

On 15/07/2010, at 2:13 AM, Peter Rathlev wrote:
> I see. Maybe a better idea is to create to independent port-mode ports
> and then let the CE-devices run LACP through these? Each side could the
> load-share as they like, and that would stay closer to the "pseudo-wire"
> concept I guess.

This is basically what we do for PAgP based inter-DC L2 trunks.  Our core devices at each location provide a set of port-based PW's and our agg switches run PAgP over the individual circuits as per normal.    Just remember to run UDLD from end-to-end on the kit connecting to the VC ports so you pick up a link failure at the far end.  


David
...