[c-nsp] Router to push 622Mbps

[Mark Tinka]

On Friday 16 July 2010 07:55:53 am roy wrote:

> I should have also specified about 7 full feeds
>  distributed between them. So, more or less, each would
>  be taking only ~5 full max. Will NPE-G100 be as much as
>  an option vs NSE-100?

I've tested an NPE-G2 with about 7 full feeds in the past 
(when the boards had just launched). It got a little slow, 
but was usable. That was pre-SR* days, so...

> Although the consensus goes to ASR1K, are there any
>  equivalent vendorJ/vendorH as alternatives
>  price-to-performance-wise (M7i/M10i)?

The M7i/M10i aren't equal comparisons when it comes to the 
ASR1000, although, I should say, product-for-product, it's 
what's on the boards from Juniper.

If Ethernet is what you're really playing for, consider 
Juniper's MX80. If you need something with a little hardware 
redundancy too (power, fans, control planes), you'll 
certainly be looking at something bigger from Juniper. That 
may skew things, somewhat.

Until Juniper can release a box targeted directly at the 
ASR1000 line, the M7i/M10i would be the most obvious choice, 
if that platform's age isn't an issue.

Cheers,

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20100718/27edec3a/attachment.bin>