[c-nsp] Router to push 622Mbps

[Phil Pierotti]

Aside from the MX line being devoted specifically to ethernet interfaces, in
what way is an MX-80 not a good competitor to (for example) an ASR1002?

Phil P

On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 4:00 AM, Mark Tinka <mtinka at globaltransit.net>wrote:

> On Friday 16 July 2010 07:55:53 am roy wrote:
>
> > I should have also specified about 7 full feeds
> >  distributed between them. So, more or less, each would
> >  be taking only ~5 full max. Will NPE-G100 be as much as
> >  an option vs NSE-100?
>
> I've tested an NPE-G2 with about 7 full feeds in the past
> (when the boards had just launched). It got a little slow,
> but was usable. That was pre-SR* days, so...
>
> > Although the consensus goes to ASR1K, are there any
> >  equivalent vendorJ/vendorH as alternatives
> >  price-to-performance-wise (M7i/M10i)?
>
> The M7i/M10i aren't equal comparisons when it comes to the
> ASR1000, although, I should say, product-for-product, it's
> what's on the boards from Juniper.
>
> If Ethernet is what you're really playing for, consider
> Juniper's MX80. If you need something with a little hardware
> redundancy too (power, fans, control planes), you'll
> certainly be looking at something bigger from Juniper. That
> may skew things, somewhat.
>
> Until Juniper can release a box targeted directly at the
> ASR1000 line, the M7i/M10i would be the most obvious choice,
> if that platform's age isn't an issue.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mark.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>