[c-nsp] Hughes v iDirect

[LM]

Any experience with STM?

El 21/07/10 17:14, Jeferson Guardia escribió:
>   iDirect is a good technology, agred with Terry. Besides, they offer great
> courses to give training for the staff in US - Virginia.
>
> Rgs,
>
> 2010/7/18 Ziv Leyes<zivl at gilat.net>
>
>    
>> I second Terry, we have good experience with iDirect too.
>> Can't tell much about Hughes, don't know their products at all.
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
>> cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Terry Rupeni (ITS-USP)
>> Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 11:18 PM
>> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Hughes v iDirect
>>
>> Hi Felix,
>>
>> I can't speak for Hughes as I've never had the experience of wuking with
>> the gear but we are currently evaluating iDirect for our Distance
>> Learning Network(USPNET) of which a heavy component is VOIP, Video
>> Conferencing, Video Multicast streaming. Our setup is a typical
>> hub/spoke topology covering 12 Pacific Countries. Now Compare to our
>> current satellite platform we use, I really like iDirect for two reasons:
>>
>> 1.) QOS provisioning mechanisms (Simple Methodology and configuration,
>> don't have to worry about Satellite TimeSlots correlation etc)
>> 2.) iDirect Monitoring/System Visibility  (Gives us real time info of
>> what is happening at the IP layer plus its correation to RF)
>>
>> There are many more reasons i can name but these two I see as a trump
>> card compared to other systems I've worked on.
>>
>> Terry
>>
>> On 15/07/2010 10:16 PM, Felix Nkansah wrote:
>>      
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am evaluating which of these satellite offerings provide the best
>>>        
>> IPoVSAT
>>      
>>> technology.
>>>
>>> The network would heavily use IP Voice and IP Video conferencing among
>>>        
>> the
>>      
>>> VSAT connected locations in a hub/spoke fashion.
>>>
>>> My client (a government agency) intends on installing/managing their own
>>> VSAT hub based on either Hughes or iDirect.
>>>
>>> I wanted to know which of these providers ensure the best performance of
>>>        
>> IP?
>>      
>>> Felix
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>>
>>>
>>>        
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ************************************************************************************
>> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
>> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals&  computer
>> viruses.
>>
>> ************************************************************************************
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ************************************************************************************
>> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
>> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals&  computer
>> viruses.
>>
>> ************************************************************************************
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>>      
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>