[c-nsp] PBR

[Gary T. Giesen]

I'm inclined to agree. VRF's are much easier to troubleshoot than PBR
when you have problems, as they use standard destination-based
routing. When you use PBR, looking at the routing table is virtually
meaningless.

GG

On 7/28/10, Jan Gregor <jan.gregor at chronix.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> The 2811 has two connections coming in on ATM0/2/0 (binding to Di1) and
>> ATM0/3/0 (binding to Di0). I've got a small gaggle of VLANs. I'm trying
>> to get VLAN10 sending/receiving everything over Di1 and everything else
>> over Di0.
>
> just as a personal preference I would suggest using vrf-lite instead of
> pbr in your case.
> Other guys saying about tcp in pbr are of course right.
>
> Beste ragards,
>
> Jan
>
>
>