[c-nsp] ipv6 on a sup32?

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 02:45:00PM -0700, Christian MacNevin wrote:
> Another question I guess I should check is regarding how it'll handle the ipv6 routing. It'll
> be acting as L2 aggregator, which to me suggests we need to have ipv6 VACLs. That supported well
> enough on the 65 platform?

No idea about IPv6 VACLs, sorry.  We use the Sup32 and Sup720 as routers,
and each customer has their own subnet, so no need for VACLs (yet).

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20100608/9b5badd5/attachment.bin>