[c-nsp] IPv6 RTBH next-hop

[Billy Guthrie]

RFC3849  specifically states it is reserved for Documentation (Not that 
one can't use it); however, in my opinion
it makes more sense to use a prefix from from fc00::/7 (RFC4193)

If anyone is interested:
Here is code that will assist in generating a prefix: 
http://www.kame.net/~suz/gen-ula.sh


Billy


Oliver Gorwits wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 12/06/2010 18:49, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
>   
>> According to RFC5156, the Documentation Prefix address range of
>> 2001:db8::/32 appears to be the IPv6 equivalent of the IPv4 TEST-NET,
>> so it would probably make sense to use this address range in the same
>> way TEST-NET has been used for S/RTBH.
>>     
>
> Many thanks indeed to all that replied, 2001:db8::/32 certainly looks to
> be just the ticket.
>
> - -- 
> Oliver Gorwits, Network and Telecommunications Group
> Oxford University Computing Services
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkwT8AcACgkQ2NPq7pwWBt6JyQCfcdcN4CzXsDBP3pluWIqE4q8p
> 5ZEAnRD6z3FwLOB64XJlgZVY7W2Zgbk5
> =sAvQ
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>