[c-nsp] smaller PI

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 09:57:47AM -0400, Jon Lewis wrote:
> Does RIPE really expect everyone to accept BGP routes as long as /29?

RIPE doesn't expect anyone to accept anything.  RIPE deals in addresses,
not in routing.

(Yes, this sounds a bit academic - but there is a point to it: what if
the operator community decides next year that /24s are evil, and only
/23s are to be accepted?  Does this mean that RIPE will have to upgrade
all existing PI blocks to /23s?)

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20100630/4bfc40bb/attachment.bin>