[c-nsp] smaller PI

[Nick Hilliard]

On 30/06/2010 17:54, Jon Lewis wrote:
> Have to?  Maybe not...but I bet they'd get flooded with requests.  The RIRs
> can't guarantee general routability, but it seems disingenuous of them to
> assign a /27 to a multihomed network when it's well known that a /27 won't
> work for them...unless they only plan to use that /27 internally and use PA
> space for their BGP announced route.

The RIPE NCC address policy people are disinterested in routing, although
not uninterested.

Nick