[c-nsp] inet vrf

[Phil Mayers]

On 17/03/10 00:09, Tim Durack wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Manu Chao<linux.yahoo at gmail.com>  wrote:
>> This feature is a nice label allocation optimisation, are you using this
>> command on RTR-2?
>
> Yes, both routers of a pair. Seems to me like it should really be the
> default behavior.
>

Why? Obviously it's a label space optimisation for places with lots of 
LSPs but I'm honestly curious - what's the downside of generating an LSP 
for routes with next-hops?