[c-nsp] inet vrf
Phil Mayers
p.mayers at imperial.ac.uk
Wed Mar 17 11:17:52 EDT 2010
On 17/03/10 15:08, Murphy, William wrote:
> The problem for me is that the 6500 seems to do it even if you don't have
> MPLS enabled. The fact that you are running BGP inside VRF causes it to
> generate labels. If I can run IGP inside VRF why then does BGP running
> inside VRF automatically assuming we want to do MPLS or L3VPN? More to the
> root of your question, the problem for me is TCAM consumption and there is
> some label scanning process that is adding about 20% utilization to my CPU.
> I am carrying full I1 routes and that is a lot of labels.
Ah. That sucks.
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list