[c-nsp] Customers requesting Layer 2 across our network
Jared Mauch
jared at puck.nether.net
Wed Mar 17 21:41:13 EDT 2010
The best way is likely either some eompls solution or l2tpv3.
Customers may have a higher than ip sla requirement in mind as it will
appear to them as a p2p Ethernet/private line solution.
Jared Mauch
On Mar 17, 2010, at 8:04 PM, Rick Kunkel <kunkel at w-link.net> wrote:
> Hello all. I'm with a company offering colocation services in the
> seattle area. Typically, we provide our bandwidth to customers, but
> I've had a rash of customers lately asking for connections directly
> to certain providers in the Westin. We are connected to the Westin
> via our IP network, but I'm stuck trying to come up with the best
> way to get layer 2 from another carrier to our customer.
>
> Here's a simplified diagram showing the links, etc. between customer
> and the outside the way we currently have it. Apologies to those
> with variable-width fonts... ;)
>
> Customer
> |
> Our Switch (port is assigned VLAN)
> |
> | (802.1q trunk)
> |
> + <--- customer gateway IP address
> Our Router
> + <--- x.x.x.1/30 address
> |
> | (WAN Fiber Link)
> |
> + <--- x.x.x.2/30 address
> Our Router
> |
> Carrier
>
> In this current situation, what's the best (if any) method for a
> customer to get a connection "directly" from the carrier, where the
> customer gets an IP address from them in the classic /30 kind of
> way? I can change our network, but probably not in vast overarching
> ways.
>
> I've got some ideas but I'm purposefully leaving the question a
> little open-ended. I know my description is a little sparse, but
> I'm trying to not give you too many details to complicate the
> fundamental question.
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> --Rick
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list