[c-nsp] OID that measures total traffic?

[Per Carlson]

On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:11, Lincoln Dale <ltd at cisco.com> wrote:
> On 25/03/2010, at 7:40 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
>> Is that implemented in (common) Cisco gear?
>
> software-based forwarding platforms: yes.
> hardware-based forwarding platforms: no.

That's not that simple. For example do a 12k return data.

When sending 1000pps of data through an E5-LC I get:

pelle at mgmt:~$ snmpdelta martin -Cp 10 ipForwDatagrams.0
RFC1213-MIB::ipForwDatagrams.0 /10 sec: 137341
RFC1213-MIB::ipForwDatagrams.0 /10 sec: 90737
RFC1213-MIB::ipForwDatagrams.0 /10 sec: 95638
RFC1213-MIB::ipForwDatagrams.0 /10 sec: 89135
RFC1213-MIB::ipForwDatagrams.0 /10 sec: 88609
RFC1213-MIB::ipForwDatagrams.0 /10 sec: 135391
RFC1213-MIB::ipForwDatagrams.0 /10 sec: 94839
RFC1213-MIB::ipForwDatagrams.0 /10 sec: 92460
RFC1213-MIB::ipForwDatagrams.0 /10 sec: 87531

Looks ok to me.

One thing though, in and out are on the same LC (but different SPA's).

-- 
Pelle

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?