[c-nsp] IOS-XR on 12K - 3.9.1 and SNMP
Marc Binderberger
marc at sniff.de
Sun May 9 14:14:42 EDT 2010
Hello Jared,
> Have not seen it in other products that run 3.9.1.
>
> Just the 12k. Tac basically told me to go away tonight as they are too
> busy with other cases to actually file a bug.
*sigh* that is what I name short sighted. If it's in 3.9.1 chances are
it makes it into 4.x as well. Can you keep pushing, pleeease?
> Last time it took a month for cisco to do something, let's see how
> long on this one.
Ah, you probably don't know the process - or you wouldn't be surprised ;-)
Not that you as a customer should bother about your vendors process but
a month is not that bad.
> The best part was talking to India that has no xr
> devices to do testing on.
Seriously? ... *sigh*
> Jared Mauch (hater of the inhuman network vendor)
well, the _network_ is non-human, just a pile of metal, plastic and
"enhanced sand" ;-)
Regards, Marc
>
> On May 6, 2010, at 10:22 PM, Mark Tinka <mtinka at globaltransit.net>
> wrote:
>
> > On Friday 07 May 2010 09:35:10 am Jared Mauch wrote:
> >
> >> I strongly recommend against using this IOS-XR version if
> >> you require SNMP in your environment.
> >>
> >> I've found a variety of "really bad" bugs.
> >>
> >> When polling via snmpv1 the 64-bit counters may not
> >> respond (at all)
> >>
> >> when polling via snmpv2 some counters (eg: ifOutDiscards)
> >> are missing.
> >
> > Did you have a chance to poll using SNMPv3?
> >
> > We'll be throwing in a couple of CRS-1's in a few weeks, and
> > I'm guessing some of these issues could be cross-platform.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Mark.
--
Marc Binderberger <marc at sniff.de>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list