[c-nsp] Server Load Balancer - Cisco vs Brocade vs F5

[tkapela at gmail.com]

(Plug) ...You can't forget about gf-slb:

http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog41/presentations/Kapela-lightning.pdf

Some LB tasks are simply "perfect" workloads for ecmp and a few server boxes...also note IP SLA + tracked objects + IOS embeded event manager can do far more than I show in these slides.

In short, your LB task might not require dedicated hardware.

-Tk

-----Original Message-----
From: scott owens <scottowens12 at gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 07:30:25 
To: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [c-nsp] Server Load Balancer - Cisco vs Brocade vs F5

Not knowing what the intended traffic type is -
you left out Barracuda and NetScalers which perform great and are at
opposite ends of the financial spectrum.

Don't just look at the 3 you mentioned.



> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 22:42:44 +0000
> From: Felix Nkansah <felixnkansah at gmail.com>
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] Server Load Balancer - Cisco vs Brocade vs F5
> Message-ID:
>        <AANLkTimEpDjpNZrllpes1hqL0UfEN_Ija53Cqle3AdRu at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Hi All,
>
> I deployed a number of Cisco CSS load balancers for a client, about 2 years
> ago.
>
> However, they tell me today that they are unhappy with the product and are
> considering non-Cisco alternatives for their new projects.
>
> Interestingly, all they say is that they have "issues" with Cisco CSS; I
> don't know what those problems are.
>
> They are considering either of F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager or Brocade
> ServerIron ADX platforms for their new server load-balancing needs.
>
> I was wondering if any of you have praises for the F5 and/or Brocade
> load-balancing offerings?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/