[c-nsp] bgp holdtime adjustment

[Aaron]

Maybe IPSLA?

On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 08:40, Chris Evans <chrisccnpspam2 at gmail.com> wrote:

> If you wanted you could break the port channel and run equal cost multipath
> bgp... then you run bfd over each link..
>
> I agree though. Hold timer is easier and will probably suit you fine..
> On Nov 11, 2010 12:10 AM, "John Elliot" <johnelliot67 at hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> > I would have something like this under L3 Interface to Upstream?:
> >> >
> >> > bfd interval 100 min_rx 100 multiplier 3
> >> >
> >> > And under bgp:
> >> >
> >> > neighbor UPSTREAM fall-over bfd
> >>
> >> Something like that, the values might be different depending on what
> >> platform you're running.
> >>
> >
> > Thanks everyone for the assistance - Upstream does support bfd, but
> unfortunately I am running PortChan on 7200, which appears to not support
> bfd!(Bugger!)...so looks like we will have to run with lower holdtime.
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>