[c-nsp] GLC-LH-SM vs SFP-GE-L

[sthaug at nethelp.no]

> > For the next round of purchases, I'm not sure what we'll end up at.  All
> > "real routers" from $C tend to be a bit on the expensive side of things,
> > so we might go for "just a switch" from $J - the MXes really look 
> > promising... and less politics there.
> 
> A significant difference from 6500/7600 is that Juniper MX is a "router
> with added switch functionality", not the other way around.
> 
> We use our MX boxes purely as routers and are very happy with them in
> that role.

On the same note, this message from Richard Steenbergen goes into more
detail:

    https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/2008-November/011885.html

Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug at nethelp.no