[c-nsp] GLC-LH-SM vs SFP-GE-L
Mark Tinka
mtinka at globaltransit.net
Fri Nov 19 07:55:36 EST 2010
On Friday, November 19, 2010 05:51:27 pm sthaug at nethelp.no
wrote:
> We use our MX boxes purely as routers and are very happy
> with them in that role.
Juniper, just so they can play in a larger space in your
network, will even propose that you use the MX as a core
switch. While it is feasible (it understands pure Layer 2
switching) and has the older DPC-X cards that don't support
IP, it really is a huge waste to use your MX as a switch.
Same applies to Cisco proposing the ASR9000 as a switch.
Why?
The Cisco 6500/Nexus 7000 and Juniper EX8200 makes better
sense for this.
Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20101119/2c0ae94e/attachment.bin>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list