[c-nsp] link flaps

[jack daniels]

any comments Dear friends would be most appreciated and very helpfull for me.

On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 9:30 AM, jack daniels <jckdaniels12 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hmm... laying intercity cables Technically good ....but not
> commercialy (which is most important)..  :)
>
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 1:43 AM, Keegan Holley
> <keegan.holley at sungard.com> wrote:
>> You can always get a really long cable so you don't need the MUX's.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 2:49 PM, jack daniels <jckdaniels12 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> I have a scenario
>>>
>>>
>>> Router R1 --------------Ethernet
>>> Cable-----MUX----------------MUX-----------Ethernet Cable-------Router
>>> R2
>>>
>>>
>>> my MUX to MUX link flaps a lot and my traffic impacts ....I have
>>> backup links also. Can I do something that when link MUX to MUX flaps
>>> I dont
>>> use this for some time , till it stablizes.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>>
>>
>>
>