[c-nsp] link flaps

[Keegan Holley]

Could you supply more info?  What kind of link goes between the mux's?  What kind of mux's? Why can't you just fix the link?  Is protection an option? Can you run a second link for redundancy?

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 27, 2010, at 1:03 PM, jack daniels <jckdaniels12 at gmail.com> wrote:

> any comments Dear friends would be most appreciated and very helpfull for me.
> 
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 9:30 AM, jack daniels <jckdaniels12 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hmm... laying intercity cables Technically good ....but not
>> commercialy (which is most important)..  :)
>> 
>> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 1:43 AM, Keegan Holley
>> <keegan.holley at sungard.com> wrote:
>>> You can always get a really long cable so you don't need the MUX's.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 2:49 PM, jack daniels <jckdaniels12 at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi guys,
>>>> 
>>>> I have a scenario
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Router R1 --------------Ethernet
>>>> Cable-----MUX----------------MUX-----------Ethernet Cable-------Router
>>>> R2
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> my MUX to MUX link flaps a lot and my traffic impacts ....I have
>>>> backup links also. Can I do something that when link MUX to MUX flaps
>>>> I dont
>>>> use this for some time , till it stablizes.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>