[c-nsp] Redistributing ipv6 static default route into eigrpfailure

Andriy Bilous andriy.bilous at gmail.com
Thu Oct 21 07:04:40 EDT 2010


It does work this way - in 12.4(24)T1 anyway. I'm curious what
hardware/software op's using and why is seed metric required there.

R1#sh run int fa0/0
Building configuration...

Current configuration : 129 bytes
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
 no ip address
 duplex auto
 speed auto
 ipv6 address 2620:0:2810:104::252/64
 ipv6 eigrp 14607
end

R1#sh run | i ipv6 route
ipv6 route ::/0 FastEthernet0/0 2620:0:2810:104::1

R1#sh run | s i r e
ipv6 router eigrp 14607
 no shutdown
 redistribute static

R1#sh ipv6 eigrp topology
IPv6-EIGRP Topology Table for AS(14607)/ID(10.0.0.3)

Codes: P - Passive, A - Active, U - Update, Q - Query, R - Reply,
       r - reply Status, s - sia Status

P ::/0, 1 successors, FD is 256
        via Rstatic (256/0)
P 2620:0:2810:104::/64, 1 successors, FD is 28160
        via Connected, FastEthernet0/0

R1#sh ver | i Ver
Cisco IOS Software, 2801 Software (C2801-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version
12.4(24)T1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3)
ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.4(13r)T, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)


On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Gert Doering <gert at greenie.muc.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 07:36:48AM +0200, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote:
>> > My bad. You are right. It has been too long since I last checked ;-)
>>
>> same here, fell into the same trap.. guess with static being the only
>> exception (is this documented anywhere?), adding  "default-metric"
>> to eigrp has been in my dna, not questioning the exceptions :)
>
> Well, I'm not sure whether it's documented anywhere, but this is soooooo
> useful :-)  - and this is what we really missed when we changed from
> customer-routes-in-EIGRP to customer-routes-in-BGP.
>
> Our typical usage case is "two routers, HSRP, trying to get (mostly)
> symmetric traffic" - so we put "bandwidth 1g" on the master router,
> "bandwith 100k" on the backup router, and EIGRP will do the right thing.
>
> With BGP, extra route maps and stuff are needed to designate certain
> statics-to-interfaces as "this is backup".
>
> (I find it surprising that it doesn't work that way for EIGRP-for-IPv6...)
>
> gert
> --
> USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
>                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
> Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
> fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list