[c-nsp] cisco MPLS AutoBandwidth Allocator
Keegan Holley
keegan.holley at sungard.com
Mon Sep 27 00:59:38 EDT 2010
Unless all 20 subnets are exactly the same, you may not need mpls at all.
Why did you go with MPLS in the first place? What sort of network is it?
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 11:51 PM, jack daniels <jckdaniels12 at gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm stuck in the understanding - does oit make sense to implement MPLS
> AutoBandwidth in scenario where I have only 20 subnets max to be sent
> on this Backbone. What will be pros and corns of this , if u experts
> can show me a path.
>
>
> Thanks and Regards
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Peter Rathlev <peter at rathlev.dk> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 00:21 +0530, jack daniels wrote:
> >> hope MPLS TE - Auto-bandwidth enhancement and MPLS TE -
> >> Auto-bandwidth allocator are same feature
> >
> > That seems strange. So you're saying you don't need something technical
> > solution to a problem you have, you need a feature called
> > "Auto-bandwidth allocator"? Even if Cisco defined that to be something
> > controlling the LEDs on your front panels and nothing else? :-)
> >
> > Googling "Auto-bandwidth allocator" gives a link to a document
> > (apparantly from 2006) describing the feature for 7500 and 7200.
> > Skimming that document and the more recent one about the 7600 points
> > towards the latter being an evolved version of the former. That took me
> > about 2 minutes at most. I shouldn't have.
> >
> > --
> > Peter
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list