[c-nsp] cisco MPLS AutoBandwidth Allocator

[jack daniels]

its core transport network for connectivity betweeen GSM packet core devices.



On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Keegan Holley
<keegan.holley at sungard.com> wrote:
> Unless all 20 subnets are exactly the same, you may not need mpls at all.
>  Why did you go with MPLS in the first place?  What sort of network is it?
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 11:51 PM, jack daniels <jckdaniels12 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I'm stuck in the understanding - does oit make sense to implement MPLS
>> AutoBandwidth in scenario where I have only 20 subnets max to be sent
>> on this Backbone. What will be pros and corns of this , if u experts
>> can show me a path.
>>
>>
>> Thanks and Regards
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Peter Rathlev <peter at rathlev.dk> wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 00:21 +0530, jack daniels wrote:
>> >> hope MPLS TE - Auto-bandwidth enhancement  and MPLS TE -
>> >> Auto-bandwidth allocator are same feature
>> >
>> > That seems strange. So you're saying you don't need something technical
>> > solution to a problem you have, you need a feature called
>> > "Auto-bandwidth allocator"? Even if Cisco defined that to be something
>> > controlling the LEDs on your front panels and nothing else? :-)
>> >
>> > Googling "Auto-bandwidth allocator" gives a link to a document
>> > (apparantly from 2006) describing the feature for 7500 and 7200.
>> > Skimming that document and the more recent one about the 7600 points
>> > towards the latter being an evolved version of the former. That took me
>> > about 2 minutes at most. I shouldn't have.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Peter
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>>
>
>