[c-nsp] no bgp route from 0.0.0.0 for a interface ip address
tao liu
taosysnet at gmail.com
Tue Apr 19 10:46:57 EDT 2011
following is the config for bgp and show ip route, thanks
router bgp 65453
no synchronization
bgp router-id 192.168.96.2
bgp log-neighbor-changes
redistribute connected route-map NEW
redistribute static route-map NEW
neighbor 192.168.2.49 remote-as 65450
neighbor 192.168.2.49 send-community
neighbor 192.168.96.1 remote-as 65453
neighbor 192.168.96.1 update-source Loopback0
neighbor 192.168.96.1 next-hop-self
no auto-summary
ip bgp-community new-format
route-map NEW permit 10
set community 65453:100
routerB#show ip route 192.168.2.50
Routing entry for 192.168.2.50/32
Known via "connected", distance 0, metric 0 (connected)
Redistributing via bgp 65453
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* directly connected, via Multilink1
Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
routerB#show ip route connected :
C 192.168.2.48/29 is directly connected, Multilink1
C 192.168.2.49/32 is directly connected, Multilink1
L 192.168.2.50/32 is directly connected, Multilink1
routerB#show ip int multilink 1
Multilink1 is up, line protocol is up
Internet address is 192.168.2.50/29
Broadcast address is 255.255.255.255
Address determined by non-volatile memory
Peer address is 192.168.2.49
MTU is 1500 bytes
Helper address is not set
Directed broadcast forwarding is disabled
Outgoing access list is not set
Inbound access list is not set
Proxy ARP is enabled
Local Proxy ARP is disabled
Security level is default
Split horizon is enabled
ICMP redirects are always sent
ICMP unreachables are always sent
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 9:12 PM, Harold 'Buz' Dale <buz.dale at usg.edu> wrote:
> At first blush it looks like 192.168.2.50 can't talk to anyone. Try
> changing his mask to /31 or something so that 192.168.2.49 is on the same
> network..
> ----
> BGP routing table entry for 192.168.2.50/32
> ----
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of tao liu
> Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 8:55 AM
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] no bgp route from 0.0.0.0 for a interface ip address
>
> Why bgp route from 0.0.0.0 doesn't exist, 192.168.2.50 is a interface ip
> address on routerB!
> Instead bgp route for 192.168.2.50 is from "192.168.96.1" and
> "192.168.2.49", it is strange.
> we redistribute static and connected on all four routers.
> the topology like below:
>
>
> lo0:192.168.96.2 lo0:192.168.96.1
> routerA ---- ebgp ----- routerB
> ------ibgp-------- routerBB
> 192.168.2.49
> 192.168.2.50 |
> |
> |
>
> |----------------ibgp--------------------------routerAA--------ebgp---------------
>
> routerB# show ip bgp 192.168.2.50
> BGP routing table entry for 192.168.2.50/32, version 151
> Paths: (2 available, best #2, table default, RIB-failure(17) - next-hop
> mismatch
> )
> Advertised to update-groups:
> 1
> 65450
> 192.168.96.1 from 192.168.96.1 (192.168.96.1)
> Origin incomplete, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal
> 65450
> 192.168.2.49 from 192.168.2.49 (192.168.0.2)
> Origin incomplete, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, external, best
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list