[c-nsp] no bgp route from 0.0.0.0 for a interface ip address
Keegan Holley
keegan.holley at sungard.com
Tue Apr 19 11:06:24 EDT 2011
Are you asking about a route to 0.0.0.0 or the default or a route with a
next-hop of 0.0.0.0?
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:46 AM, tao liu <taosysnet at gmail.com> wrote:
> following is the config for bgp and show ip route, thanks
>
> router bgp 65453
> no synchronization
> bgp router-id 192.168.96.2
> bgp log-neighbor-changes
> redistribute connected route-map NEW
> redistribute static route-map NEW
> neighbor 192.168.2.49 remote-as 65450
> neighbor 192.168.2.49 send-community
> neighbor 192.168.96.1 remote-as 65453
> neighbor 192.168.96.1 update-source Loopback0
> neighbor 192.168.96.1 next-hop-self
> no auto-summary
>
> ip bgp-community new-format
>
> route-map NEW permit 10
> set community 65453:100
>
> routerB#show ip route 192.168.2.50
> Routing entry for 192.168.2.50/32
> Known via "connected", distance 0, metric 0 (connected)
> Redistributing via bgp 65453
> Routing Descriptor Blocks:
> * directly connected, via Multilink1
> Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
>
> routerB#show ip route connected :
> C 192.168.2.48/29 is directly connected, Multilink1
> C 192.168.2.49/32 is directly connected, Multilink1
> L 192.168.2.50/32 is directly connected, Multilink1
>
>
> routerB#show ip int multilink 1
> Multilink1 is up, line protocol is up
> Internet address is 192.168.2.50/29
> Broadcast address is 255.255.255.255
> Address determined by non-volatile memory
> Peer address is 192.168.2.49
> MTU is 1500 bytes
> Helper address is not set
> Directed broadcast forwarding is disabled
> Outgoing access list is not set
> Inbound access list is not set
> Proxy ARP is enabled
> Local Proxy ARP is disabled
> Security level is default
> Split horizon is enabled
> ICMP redirects are always sent
> ICMP unreachables are always sent
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 9:12 PM, Harold 'Buz' Dale <buz.dale at usg.edu>
> wrote:
>
> > At first blush it looks like 192.168.2.50 can't talk to anyone. Try
> > changing his mask to /31 or something so that 192.168.2.49 is on the same
> > network..
> > ----
> > BGP routing table entry for 192.168.2.50/32
> > ----
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> > cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of tao liu
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 8:55 AM
> > To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: [c-nsp] no bgp route from 0.0.0.0 for a interface ip address
> >
> > Why bgp route from 0.0.0.0 doesn't exist, 192.168.2.50 is a interface ip
> > address on routerB!
> > Instead bgp route for 192.168.2.50 is from "192.168.96.1" and
> > "192.168.2.49", it is strange.
> > we redistribute static and connected on all four routers.
> > the topology like below:
> >
> >
> > lo0:192.168.96.2 lo0:192.168.96.1
> > routerA ---- ebgp ----- routerB
> > ------ibgp-------- routerBB
> > 192.168.2.49
> > 192.168.2.50 |
> > |
> > |
> >
> >
> |----------------ibgp--------------------------routerAA--------ebgp---------------
> >
> > routerB# show ip bgp 192.168.2.50
> > BGP routing table entry for 192.168.2.50/32, version 151
> > Paths: (2 available, best #2, table default, RIB-failure(17) - next-hop
> > mismatch
> > )
> > Advertised to update-groups:
> > 1
> > 65450
> > 192.168.96.1 from 192.168.96.1 (192.168.96.1)
> > Origin incomplete, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal
> > 65450
> > 192.168.2.49 from 192.168.2.49 (192.168.0.2)
> > Origin incomplete, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, external, best
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list