[c-nsp] Current recommendations for publishing a web site on IPV6 using Cisco products (Router, Firewall, Load Balancer)?
Gert Doering
gert at greenie.muc.de
Wed Aug 3 17:16:46 EDT 2011
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 03:12:05PM -0600, P C wrote:
> The ACE is a current model and nearly new (Ace 4710). I have no
> chassis based switches to utilize an ACE 30 with, and as far as a
> google search tells me, the 30/4710 both run the same software and
> neither have IPV6 support.
Google again. The ACE 30 has a different daughter board that does
the packet mangling, and that one has IPv6 support (while the 10/20
have not enough code space for IPv6).
Now I'm not actually sure the ACE 30 is already *shipping* with IPv6,
but I've been told that it is hardware capable of doing it, unlike
the 10/20.
As for the appliances, I have no idea what hardware is in there.
> What are your suggestions for the "Extra box"? Although I really
> think there should be some sort of usable solution what what I have.
> Something that works might be better than nothing at all.
There's a couple of open source NAT64 implementations running on Linux
that might do what you want. "faithd" on FreeBSD is also able to do
that (connection coming in on IPv6, leaving on IPv4).
> Of course little to no money will go into this. Is this nearly-new
> kit (nothing here is end of life) can't provide an IPv6 solution, it
> probably just won't be deployed. The financial driver is not that
> great.
There should be a large driver to beat your Cisco representative with
this kit. And whoever authorized purchase of a "nearly-new" kit that
has no IPv6 support in it.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20110803/f36f8220/attachment.pgp>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list