[c-nsp] Layer 3 on an ES+ EVC

[Mark Tinka]

On Tuesday, August 30, 2011 03:30:17 PM Gert Doering wrote:

> After all, how can you see that you bought such an
> expensive card if the bonus features are just hidden
> under a common UI?

:-) - I'd be happy enough to see said features under a 
regular sub-interface and know that they work. That's 
different enough for me if I want to justify dropping WS-
X67xx cards in favour of ES/ES+ units.

Oh well...

Two issues we have with EFP's (the pseudo-interfaces created 
under an EVC) is monitoring and feature parity with regular 
interfaces, as Saku initially mentioned.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20110830/4b2ecbcc/attachment-0001.pgp>